The Crucible Essay Essays - Salem Witch Trials, The Crucible

The Crucible Essay It is a play with gigantic emotions with numerous inside turns covered up in the chronicles of the genuine story. It is a play with passionate emotions, sentiments of outrage, despise, abhorrent, control, great, and immaculateness. It is The Crucible. In the play, Arthur Miller builds up the possibility that effectively held convictions direct individuals' conduct, Abigail Williams who charges others to escape from discipline, Mary Warren who decides to mislead keep herself in the clear, and John Proctor who decides to forfeit his life to spare the lives of other guiltless individuals. Arthur Miller creates Abigail Williams as an underhanded character. She entices Proctor into salacity, and come its unlawful demonstrations which all are against the Puritan religion. To get away from discipline for moving, she avoids the activities and accuses them for another person, and couldn't care less what number of lives she demolishes. Later when she develops into force and impact, she appears to appreciate sending these guiltless individuals their demises. She likewise utilizes abhorrent activities camouflaged as great by conceding who was with the fallen angel, ?She sends her soul on me in chapel; she makes me giggle at petition!? (P.44) Obviously the individuals she blames are really honest, however she can control Judge Danforth into accepting that she is making the best decision and coming clean. Mary Warren's expectations toward the start of the story were to do acceptable and equity. In any case, she sees that when she is in a tough situation, she likewise needs somebody to divert the discipline on. This covetousness brings about her idiom that John Proctor was related with Satan, and that he had her and caused her to do all of wrong activities, ?You are the Devil's man! I'll not hang with you! I love God, I love God.?(P.118) Her goals were first acceptable, however then her activities transformed into malevolent, much the same as Abigail Williams. John Proctor is the hero in the play. He is a saint toward the finish of the play, when he dishonestly concedes that he was with Satan every one of the a long. He at that point won't tell the pass judgment and blame anybody for being with Satan too like Abigail did. In this way he might be viewed as a legend, for biting the dust for a reason for sparing the lives of other blameless individuals. John Proctor additionally attempts to shield his better half, and endeavors to cause the adjudicator to acknowledge how Abigail Williams is controlling him. Taking everything into account, Arthur Miller builds up the possibility that intensely held convictions direct individuals' conduct. The powers of good consistently attempted to do what was the best for everyone, regardless of whether it implied violating some Puritan laws. The detestable gathering did whatever was best for themselves. They were ravenous, and had no thought of others. Book index english and Social Studies Department

Why Developed Countries Should Not Produce Nuclear Power

Presentation Nuclear force is regularly evolved from the splitting of atomic components to create heat (Howtopowertheworld, 2010, p. 1). Throughout the years, created nations have been at the cutting edge in the improvement of this wellspring of vitality, with ebb and flow world measurements evaluating that, there are around 31 nations which create atomic power.Advertising We will compose a custom research paper test on Why Developed Countries Should Not Produce Nuclear Power explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More Though atomic force age is gradually picking up noticeable quality on the planet, particularly since the world is looking for additional wellsprings of efficient power vitality, atomic vitality is an extraordinary wellspring of vitality since it bears exceptional attributes which recognize it from different wellsprings of vitality. For example, atomic vitality has been recognized to be a perilous wellspring of vitality, particularly if a mishap occurs (Howto powertheworld, 2010, p. 1). This is the motivation behind why a few nations are against its utilization. For example, created nations, for example, Australia and Austria are immovably contradicted to the improvement of atomic vitality (Breeze, 2005). The year 2011 saw the most exceedingly terrible atomic debacle in late time, with radiation fears ready, at Japan’s Fukushima plant, when the nation was hit by a tidal wave and quake, which influenced the atomic plant. Considering these worries, a few nations are gradually assessing their atomic force age systems. This examination brings up that, created nations, which have been at the cutting edge in the age of atomic vitality, should quit doing as such, on the grounds that the drawbacks of atomic force age enormously exceed their favorable circumstances. This reality is bolstered by examine considers recommending that: atomic vitality has the capability of being utilized for psychological warfare; atomic vitality produces hazar dous radioactive waste and atomic vitality is exceptionally exorbitant, and if there should be an occurrence of an atomic catastrophe, the results might be extremely serious. Radioactivity is the significant concern related with atomic force age. Truth be told, in the ongoing Fukushima atomic force age debacle, occupants were encouraged to empty encompassing areas (around the atomic force plant) to diminish the odds of being influenced by radioactivity. The threat of radioactivity is serious on the grounds that it might take countless years to diminish radioactive beams to safe levels (Howtopowertheworld, 2010, p. 1). This reality implies that, if an atomic catastrophe ever occurs, ages of human lives may live with its outcomes and this will clearly adversy affect humankind. The consequences for mankind can consequently not be thought little of in light of the fact that reviews have demonstrated that, atomic force radioactivity may effectsly affect the human’s regenerative fr amework, and it likewise has the capability of causing consumes, loose bowels, retching and other extreme wellbeing impacts. This is a piece of the issue related with atomic force age on the grounds that with radioactivity, it might be hard to identify radioactive waves, considerably following quite a long while (Furry Elephant, 2011). Despite the fact that radioactive waves created from atomic force age may not be legitimately consumed through the human skin, all things considered, individuals may ingest certain radioactive core, in things, for example, nourishments, which are defiled with the substance.Advertising Looking for inquire about paper on other innovation? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The way where radioactivity influences individuals are various and this is the reason most nations restricted the significant of food from Japan when it encountered its atomic catastrophe. At the point when these radioactive com ponents are ingested into the human framework, it turns out to be extremely hard to control them, not to mention dispose of them, since they can influence the human DNA, because of their high capacity to ionize. This may accordingly cause malignant growth, among other negative wellbeing impacts, which likewise have the capacity of causing demise. Considering radioactivity has a high capability of influencing all parts of life, it beats sense, enduring exercises which may conceivably prompt the event of such a debacle. On the off chance that such a fiasco strikes, humankind will potentially not be the equivalent and from this understanding, it doesn't bode well for created countries to open mankind to such kind of lethal impacts. Potential Terrorist Applications The colossal force atomic force age has; makes it a prime apparatus of psychological warfare. Atomic force age can be utilized to make atomic bombs, which are deadly and can be utilized to wage fear on a given country. For ex ample, there is sufficient proof progressed by researchers to recommend that, atomic force can be utilized to smooth a whole city, executing a large number of individuals at a go (TMIA, 2011). Ongoing occasions have seen the US guarantee that, few nations over the globe, for example, Iran and Iraq are making atomic bombs, which may affect world harmony. Regardless of whether these charges are valid or not will be not the subject of this examination, yet the circumstance uncovered how atomic force can be utilized to cause a great deal of agitation, and perhaps destabilize world harmony. In any case, ongoing investigations uncover an additionally annihilating danger to a country’s harmony after it was avowed that, an assault on an atomic force plant by fear mongers, is likewise another procedure to wage an atomic war against a country (TMIA, 2011). Clearly, reality behind this attestation comes from the way that, an assault on an atomic force plant would add up to an emanation of radioactive beams which would influence a nation’s populace. This psychological oppressor procedure is simpler than gathering an atomic bomb or conveying an atomic bomb to a fear based oppressor target. Also, this sort of assault is savage and its impacts on human lives are incomprehensible. From this investigation along these lines, we see that, whenever created countries keep delivering atomic vitality and building progressively atomic plants, they increment their powerlessness as an objective of psychological warfare, and clearly presenting their residents to the unfavorable impacts of atomic force age. Significant expense of Building Nuclear Facilities and the Small Possibility of Accidents The expense of building new atomic force plants to create power, or give elective wellsprings of vitality is faltering and far off for some countries.Advertising We will compose a custom research paper test on Why Developed Countries Should Not Produce Nuclear Power explicitly for y ou for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More With an ineffectively performing world economy and with expanded obligation loads for some significant world economies, for example, America, it looks bad for created countries to keep creating atomic force †diverting a great deal of assets to such activities, while different parts of the financial parts of the economy, for example, wellbeing, training and such like components remain underfunded. In the US, it is evaluated that, the expense of intensity, produced from atomic plants is triple that of the ordinary rates paid for power produced using other elective wellsprings of vitality, for example, hydroelectricity (Yanak, 2009, p. 1). It is additionally evaluated that, the expense of paying for atomic vitality is multiple times the expense of productivity got from such a vitality cost. The high rates to be paid for atomic vitality clearly radiates from the significant expenses related with atomic force age, and financial specialists or g overnments need to pass this expense down to the buyers to recoup such significant expenses. This sort of situation just uncovered residents in created countries to significant expenses of vitality. At the point when contrasted with other elective vitality creation strategies, atomic vitality stands apart as the most costly vitality source at any point developed by humankind. The creation of atomic vitality thusly not just stands as an issue of basic monetary significance, yet additionally a matter of moral concern, thinking about a preoccupation of colossal money related assets to vitality creation, adds up to a hardship of other financial obligations which governments in created nations should give. End Nuclear force age in created nations, however a smart thought at face esteem, is damaged with a great deal of discussion in regards to its wellbeing and effect on human lives. In spite of the fact that its tremendous monetary expenses can be carried by a few governments in created nations, it ought to be gotten that, there should be a money saving advantage investigation to measure the expense and potential advantages that originate from atomic influence age. With a few progressively significant obligations that legislatures need to perform, it isn't moral to redirect a great deal of state assets to create atomic vitality, to the detriment of other state needs. Despite these worries, atomic vitality has been gone to a policy centered issue, with nations exchanging allegations and counter-allegations in regards to the creation of atomic weapons, since it is realized that, atomic vitality can be utilized to advance demonstrations of fear based oppression, in this manner destabilizing world peace.Advertising Searching for inquire about paper on other innovation? How about we check whether we can support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Find out More The impact of an atomic fear act is huge and incomprehensible. Radioactivity is likewise another motivation behind why created nations should quit delivering atomic vitality since they open their residents to the dangers of radioactivity if an atomic mishap occurs. On the whole, the components distinguished in this examination uncover cut off negative impacts of atomic force age and from the whole investigation, it is unthinkable for any administration to exist if such catastrophes ever happen to their residents. To shield residents from such unfriendly impacts, it is significant for created nations to stop atomic force age. References Breeze, P. (2005). Force Generation Technologies. New York: Newnes. Textured Elephant. (2011). Why Study Radioactivit

4 Ways to Tame Your Phone and Remain Productive

4 Ways to Tame Your Phone and Remain Productive When was the last time you spent a day without your phone? Half a day? Heck, even a couple of hours? If you’re anything like me, you probably can’t remember a time where you were purposefully without your phone. Our livesâ€"both personally and professionallyâ€"have become so controlled by the flow of communication that even a few minutes without our phones within reach has been shown to cause anxiety, physical signs of stress, and even depression in some users.   But despite their misgivings, our phones are also incredible tools for productivity, when used properly. Unfortunately, few of us do this. Instead of supporting us with the work we need to do, our phones become beacons for interruptions. You might be always on and available for important messages. But you’re also always on and available for stress-inducing Slack messages, aggravating emails, and a constant stream of busy work. So with our phones so firmly ingrained in our day-to-day, the question becomes: Can we still be productive, even with our devices around us 24/7?   It’s not how much you use your phone that’s a problem. It’s how often you impulsively check it. You probably know you should be looking at your phone less often. But it’s not entirely your fault that you can’t leave it alone. As humans, we’re driven to seek rewards of all sorts. And every time you look at your phone and see a little red dot next to an app or feel it buzz in your pocket, it sends a signal your brain just can’t ignore. You see, every time you get a notification from your phone it’s like pulling on a slot machine. Your brain doesn’t know whether it’s going to get an Instagram like, a new Twitter follower, a text from an old friend, or a spam email. And to be honest, it doesn’t matter. This kind of variable reward system is how we learn and build habits and it’s pretty much impossible to ignore. So what do you do? The easy answer is to say you’re going to turn off all notifications. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work either. According to Nir Eyal, author of Hooked: How to make habit-forming products, apps and tools on your phone have become so good at forming habits that they don’t even need notifications to steal your attention. We check our phones not just because something told us to. But because we’ve built habits that tell us to do it on our own.     It’s gotten so bad that researchers have found that even a silent phone near you causes increased anxiety, stress, and disruption to your focus. Instead of trying to go cold turkey and block the external triggers drawing us to our phones, we need to find ways to tame its constant pull and build a better relationship that puts us in control of when and how we use it. Here are a few suggestions to get you started:               Productive Task ManagementDiscover MeisterTask Get started Its free! Get started Step 1: Create distance between you and your phone to lessen your habit of “Checking in” One of the main issues we have with our phones is simply just how present they are in our lives. According to marketing firm dscout, we “touch” our phones 2617 per day. Meanwhile, Apple recently revealed that iPhone users unlock their phones around 80 times every 24 hours. When it comes to the work things that pull at our attentionâ€"email and instant messengers like Slackâ€"we found the average user checks in nearly every 7.5 minutes. Whichever number seems closest to your own usage, it’s clear we’ve built a habit of constantly needing to check in on our phones. The first step in taming your phone usage is to create friction to disrupt that habit. As Catherine Price, author of How to Break Up With Your Phone, explains: “We often try to jump in and start changing stuff without really taking the time that’s necessary to understand why we’re reaching for our phones, and how we feel when we are on our phones. And I think those are very powerful questions to ask.” One solution that Catherine suggests in her book is to create a moment of friction as you reach for your phone. To do this, she’s created custom lock screen wallpapers that ask “What for? Why now? What else?” Next, try to create more situations where you’re physically separated from your phone. Follow a recipe in a cookbook instead of on a website. Or simply place your phone in your bag instead of in your pocket. As Dr. Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, author of The Distraction Addiction, explains: “Not carrying your phone right against your body but carrying it in your bag can help ease some of that sense that you always need… to have a little of your attention turned towards your phone.” Step 2: Remove immediate triggers from your home screen to stay on task The scope for our phones to go from helpful tools to destructive forces depends on what we see the moment we open them. Your home screen is a battle for your attention. And unfortunately, most of us are on the losing side. Tristan Harris of the Center for Humane Technology, calls these “menus.” Every time you open your phone, you’re presented with a menu of options and paths to choose from. The problem is, these menus don’t tell the whole picture, but rather limit our options of what to do. Worse than that, when we give ourselves distracting menus, we’re more likely to lose focus and slip off down the rabbit hole.   “The ‘most empowering’ menu is different than the menu that has the most choices. But when we blindly surrender to the menus we’re given, it’s easy to lose track of the difference.” But unlike a restaurant where you go for specific dishes, we have full control over the menus we see on our phones. So ask yourself, what options do you want on your menu? Do you want social media, email, and games? Or notes, weather, and tools? “By shaping the menus we pick from, technology hijacks the way we perceive our choices and replaces them with new ones. But the closer we pay attention to the options we’re given, the more we’ll notice when they don’t actually align with our true needs.” To use your phone productively, you need to create the right menu. That means removing any distracting apps that will pull at your attention and bombard you with notifications. If you want to go to the extreme, you can even turn your phone greyscale to remove the color triggers from app icons. Step 3: Practice better phone hygiene to set standards around focus and attention How you use your phone doesn’t just affect you. It also signals to other people how they should use theirs as well. So if you want to tame your phone’s control over you, it’s going to have to be a group effort. According to the Harvard Business Review, managers who frequently send emails and check their phones during meetings are 2.2 times more likely to have direct reports who do the same thing. If you’re in a position of leadership at your company or just want to help the people around you spend less time on their phones, you need to be the source of change. Nir Eyal, author of Hooked, suggests creating something like a “digital hat rack.” With this approach, devices are left outside of meetings so you have more face-to-face interactions and are less likely to be distracted. And it’s not just in-person behaviors that should be changed. If you send emails out of hours, you can expect to receive them as well. But if you wait to respond during working hours, you can slowly change the culture around how often people are expected to be “on”.  This, of course, goes for Slack messages too. Step 4: Use a tool to help understand and control your actual usage Changing the way you use your phone means changing your behavior. And research has shown that to change the way we think and act, we need more than just willpower alone. Thankfully, there are plenty of tools you can use to either add friction to your phone usage  or track the time you spend on it for an accurate picture of just how much it’s impacting your workday. Here’s a few you might want to check out: Arianna Huffington’s Thrive App turns off notifications, calls, and texts except from people on your VIP list Siempo changes your interface to help you question why you’re using your phone RescueTime tracks the time you spend on your Android phone (and your desktop), giving you a super accurate view of how you’re using it and how much of your attention it takes Forest encourages you to stay away from your phone by growing virtual “trees” that die once you start using your phone. While these tools can help change your behavior, they aren’t standalone solutions. It’s always more important to understand why you’re letting your phone distract you, rather than rely on an external tool to try to solve your problems.   It’s all too easy to vilify our phones as the source of all our distractions. But the truth is that they’re fantastic tools that can actually help increase our productivity, giving us the flexibility to work when and how we want to, and capture creative ideas quickly and in the moment.   Instead of blaming our phones, we need to start blaming the bad phone usage habits we’ve built. By creating friction when we feel the desire to use our phone, removing triggers, and creating a better culture around phone use, we can start to use them on our terms. Not theirs. Productive Task ManagementDiscover MeisterTask Get started Its free! Get started 4 Ways to Tame Your Phone and Remain Productive When was the last time you spent a day without your phone? Half a day? Heck, even a couple of hours? If you’re anything like me, you probably can’t remember a time where you were purposefully without your phone. Our livesâ€"both personally and professionallyâ€"have become so controlled by the flow of communication that even a few minutes without our phones within reach has been shown to cause anxiety, physical signs of stress, and even depression in some users.   But despite their misgivings, our phones are also incredible tools for productivity, when used properly. Unfortunately, few of us do this. Instead of supporting us with the work we need to do, our phones become beacons for interruptions. You might be always on and available for important messages. But you’re also always on and available for stress-inducing Slack messages, aggravating emails, and a constant stream of busy work. So with our phones so firmly ingrained in our day-to-day, the question becomes: Can we still be productive, even with our devices around us 24/7?   It’s not how much you use your phone that’s a problem. It’s how often you impulsively check it. You probably know you should be looking at your phone less often. But it’s not entirely your fault that you can’t leave it alone. As humans, we’re driven to seek rewards of all sorts. And every time you look at your phone and see a little red dot next to an app or feel it buzz in your pocket, it sends a signal your brain just can’t ignore. You see, every time you get a notification from your phone it’s like pulling on a slot machine. Your brain doesn’t know whether it’s going to get an Instagram like, a new Twitter follower, a text from an old friend, or a spam email. And to be honest, it doesn’t matter. This kind of variable reward system is how we learn and build habits and it’s pretty much impossible to ignore. So what do you do? The easy answer is to say you’re going to turn off all notifications. Unfortunately, that doesn’t work either. According to Nir Eyal, author of Hooked: How to make habit-forming products, apps and tools on your phone have become so good at forming habits that they don’t even need notifications to steal your attention. We check our phones not just because something told us to. But because we’ve built habits that tell us to do it on our own.     It’s gotten so bad that researchers have found that even a silent phone near you causes increased anxiety, stress, and disruption to your focus. Instead of trying to go cold turkey and block the external triggers drawing us to our phones, we need to find ways to tame its constant pull and build a better relationship that puts us in control of when and how we use it. Here are a few suggestions to get you started:               Productive Task ManagementDiscover MeisterTask Get started Its free! Get started Step 1: Create distance between you and your phone to lessen your habit of “Checking in” One of the main issues we have with our phones is simply just how present they are in our lives. According to marketing firm dscout, we “touch” our phones 2617 per day. Meanwhile, Apple recently revealed that iPhone users unlock their phones around 80 times every 24 hours. When it comes to the work things that pull at our attentionâ€"email and instant messengers like Slackâ€"we found the average user checks in nearly every 7.5 minutes. Whichever number seems closest to your own usage, it’s clear we’ve built a habit of constantly needing to check in on our phones. The first step in taming your phone usage is to create friction to disrupt that habit. As Catherine Price, author of How to Break Up With Your Phone, explains: “We often try to jump in and start changing stuff without really taking the time that’s necessary to understand why we’re reaching for our phones, and how we feel when we are on our phones. And I think those are very powerful questions to ask.” One solution that Catherine suggests in her book is to create a moment of friction as you reach for your phone. To do this, she’s created custom lock screen wallpapers that ask “What for? Why now? What else?” Next, try to create more situations where you’re physically separated from your phone. Follow a recipe in a cookbook instead of on a website. Or simply place your phone in your bag instead of in your pocket. As Dr. Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, author of The Distraction Addiction, explains: “Not carrying your phone right against your body but carrying it in your bag can help ease some of that sense that you always need… to have a little of your attention turned towards your phone.” Step 2: Remove immediate triggers from your home screen to stay on task The scope for our phones to go from helpful tools to destructive forces depends on what we see the moment we open them. Your home screen is a battle for your attention. And unfortunately, most of us are on the losing side. Tristan Harris of the Center for Humane Technology, calls these “menus.” Every time you open your phone, you’re presented with a menu of options and paths to choose from. The problem is, these menus don’t tell the whole picture, but rather limit our options of what to do. Worse than that, when we give ourselves distracting menus, we’re more likely to lose focus and slip off down the rabbit hole.   “The ‘most empowering’ menu is different than the menu that has the most choices. But when we blindly surrender to the menus we’re given, it’s easy to lose track of the difference.” But unlike a restaurant where you go for specific dishes, we have full control over the menus we see on our phones. So ask yourself, what options do you want on your menu? Do you want social media, email, and games? Or notes, weather, and tools? “By shaping the menus we pick from, technology hijacks the way we perceive our choices and replaces them with new ones. But the closer we pay attention to the options we’re given, the more we’ll notice when they don’t actually align with our true needs.” To use your phone productively, you need to create the right menu. That means removing any distracting apps that will pull at your attention and bombard you with notifications. If you want to go to the extreme, you can even turn your phone greyscale to remove the color triggers from app icons. Step 3: Practice better phone hygiene to set standards around focus and attention How you use your phone doesn’t just affect you. It also signals to other people how they should use theirs as well. So if you want to tame your phone’s control over you, it’s going to have to be a group effort. According to the Harvard Business Review, managers who frequently send emails and check their phones during meetings are 2.2 times more likely to have direct reports who do the same thing. If you’re in a position of leadership at your company or just want to help the people around you spend less time on their phones, you need to be the source of change. Nir Eyal, author of Hooked, suggests creating something like a “digital hat rack.” With this approach, devices are left outside of meetings so you have more face-to-face interactions and are less likely to be distracted. And it’s not just in-person behaviors that should be changed. If you send emails out of hours, you can expect to receive them as well. But if you wait to respond during working hours, you can slowly change the culture around how often people are expected to be “on”.  This, of course, goes for Slack messages too. Step 4: Use a tool to help understand and control your actual usage Changing the way you use your phone means changing your behavior. And research has shown that to change the way we think and act, we need more than just willpower alone. Thankfully, there are plenty of tools you can use to either add friction to your phone usage  or track the time you spend on it for an accurate picture of just how much it’s impacting your workday. Here’s a few you might want to check out: Arianna Huffington’s Thrive App turns off notifications, calls, and texts except from people on your VIP list Siempo changes your interface to help you question why you’re using your phone RescueTime tracks the time you spend on your Android phone (and your desktop), giving you a super accurate view of how you’re using it and how much of your attention it takes Forest encourages you to stay away from your phone by growing virtual “trees” that die once you start using your phone. While these tools can help change your behavior, they aren’t standalone solutions. It’s always more important to understand why you’re letting your phone distract you, rather than rely on an external tool to try to solve your problems.   It’s all too easy to vilify our phones as the source of all our distractions. But the truth is that they’re fantastic tools that can actually help increase our productivity, giving us the flexibility to work when and how we want to, and capture creative ideas quickly and in the moment.   Instead of blaming our phones, we need to start blaming the bad phone usage habits we’ve built. By creating friction when we feel the desire to use our phone, removing triggers, and creating a better culture around phone use, we can start to use them on our terms. Not theirs. Productive Task ManagementDiscover MeisterTask Get started Its free! Get started

Understanding the Japanese Phrase Sore De Kimatta

Learn how to pronounce the Japanese phrase sore de kimatta and what it means in English. Meaning Done! Pronunciation Listen to the audio file for Sore de kimatta Japanese Characters 㠁 Ã£â€šÅ'㠁 §Ã¦ ± ºÃ£  ¾Ã£  £Ã£ Å¸Ã£â‚¬â€š 㠁 Ã£â€šÅ'㠁 §Ã£  Ã£  ¾Ã£  £Ã£ Å¸Ã£â‚¬â€š

Essay on Case Study Analysis Union Carbide Corporation...

The Political, Social, and Legal Environment of Business Case Study Analysis: Union Carbide Corporation and Bhopal A single slip in action may cause lasting sorrow. A slight mistake in operation at a Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal of India causes a lot of deaths and injuries. What a tragedy it is. Undoubtedly, there must be something wrong with the management of the plant. In addition to the plant, the governments related in India that issued permits and provided incentives for the plant, Bhopal community officials who permitted slum dwellers to move near the plant in illegal settlements, Indian environmental and safety inspectors should also be responsible for this. The governments related in India issued permits†¦show more content†¦That was really amazing to me. There is no difference whether the plant had the gauges or not in this way. Unfortunately, the refrigeration units that cooled the tanks had been shut down for five months as an economy measure. Nevertheless, every instrument has its own use. It is not allowed to ignore any one part of a machine. When the operator informed his supervisor, the supervisor suggested fixing leak after a tea break for about twenty five minutes. It is so unbelievable that a supervisor would not respond to his subordinate immediately. The situation may become totally different if the supervisor can take im mediate action to that situation at that time since a supervisor may have more knowledge or experience to control the whole situation. It never rains but it pours. The scrubber, which was designed to handle the temperature and pressure, and a flare tower, designed to burn off toxic gases before the gas escaped into the atmosphere were either down for maintenance or off-line. At the same time, the plant violated another procedure in the MIC processing manual, which called for leaving one tank empty as safety measure. When the plant superintendent arrived in the control room, gas leak was out of control already. I think that it could be a turning point at that time only if the plant superintendent could also thought of how to rescue the slumShow MoreRelatedCase Study Analysis: Union Carbide Corporation and Bhopal1097 Words   |  5 PagesBUS 784 The Political, Social, and Legal Environment of Business Case Study Analysis: Union Carbide Corporation and Bhopal Date: 11-16-99 Name: Sheng-Chi Chen Student Id.: 997541112 A single slip in action may cause lasting sorrow. A slight mistake in operation at a Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal of India causes a lot of deaths and injuries. What a tragedy it is. Undoubtedly, there must be something wrong with the management of the plant. In addition to the plant, theRead MoreBhopal Gas Tragedy : A Terrible Gas Leak1642 Words   |  7 PagesSutton November 11, 2015 Bhopal Gas Tragedy A terrible gas leak on December 2nd and 3rd, 1984 had some of the worst impacts on the central part of India. It happened in the late night and early morning hours on those days when the clouds where filled with gray smoke which contained Methyl Isocyanate(MIC), one of the most poisonous gases from Union Carbide plant in the city of Bhopal. It was called one of the world’s most dangerous environmental disasters. The people of Bhopal had no idea what was comingRead MoreThe Bhopal Tragedy23347 Words   |  94 PagesSUMMARY FOR THE BHOPAL TRAGEDY HISTORY AND BACKGROUND Bhopal is the capital city of Madhya Pradesh, the largest and one of the most economically depressed states in the nation. At 1970s, the public health infrastructure, sewage and waste system in Bhopal are still in very poor condition . Besides, mass casualty emergency response system also lacking in Bhopal. Union Carbide Corporation is one of the largest chemical and polymer companies in the united state. In 1984, Union Carbide operated in 37Read MoreCase Study Action Plan: Union Carbide Bhopal Accident2186 Words   |  9 PagesCase Study Action Plan: Union Carbide Bhopal accident Learning Team A: Michael Proffitt, Amanda Garrity, Sean Riedel, Cippy Seidler La Shonta Fuller University of Phoenix PHL 323/Ethics in Management History: Controversy Union Carbide In December of 1984 controversy surrounded Union Carbide, a chemical and polymer company founded in 1917, when the company had a poisonous gas leak from their pesticide plant in Bhopal, India. (Union Carbide Corporation, 2011) This incident killed thousandsRead MoreBhopal Gas Tragedy7928 Words   |  32 Pages[pic] TERM PAPER ON BHOPAL GAS TRAGEDY : IS THE GOVERNMENT SLEEPING Submitted to :- Submitted by :- Lect.Vishwas chakranarayan Harpreet singh Roll no. A18 Section :- S1001 INDEX 1.Preface 2.Acknowledgement 3.Contents 4.IntroductionRead MoreBhopal Gas Disaster84210 Words   |  337 PagesExecutive Summary On December 3, 1984, toxic poisonous methyl isocyanate gas leaked from Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL s) pesticide plant in Bhopal. The gas leak triggered a disaster that is now widely recognized as the world worst industrial catastrophe. Thousands of people were killed instantly and more than 25,000 people have died of gas-related illnesses, several thousands more maimed for life since. Union Carbide negotiated a settlement with the Indian Government in 1989 for $470 million - a totalRead MoreOrganizational Failure And Its Impact On Organizational Success1795 Words   |  8 PagesThere is great need to learn from failure and this cannot be overemphasized. Few organizations manage to do it well and the ones that manage to do it are few. In the past years, many corporations have failed with very few having attained success. Business and Management research has viewed organizational failure with no great regard to organizational success. Organizational failure is viewed with less s ignificance or, as being complementary to research on the success of organizations. As reportedRead MoreEssay on India: The Cause of the Bhopal Disaster2606 Words   |  11 Pages1] In 1984, the Union Carbide India Limited (UCIL) pesticide plant in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, made the history witnessed the worst industrial disaster ever in the world. The Bhopal disaster (Bhopal Gas Tragedy) happened by gas leak incident occurred at the night time of 2-3 AM in December of 1984. The result of this gas leak caused risks for more than half million people by exposing them to chemicals hazards; one of these chemicals is methyl isocyanate (MIC) gas. Not only this, it caused an immediateRead MoreCrisis Management - Case Study6562 Words   |  27 PagesEuropean Journal of Scientific Research ISSN 1450-216X Vol.27 No.3 (2009), pp.358-371  © EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. 2009 http://www.eurojournals.com/ejsr.htm Crisis Management- A Case Study on Mumbai Terrorist Attack Manisha Shekhar Centre for Strategic Analysis Research Deptt. of Electronics Communication Dr. M. C. Saxena college of Engg. Technology, UPTU, Lucknow, India E-mail: manisha.shekhar123@gmail.com Tel: +91-0522-4095700; Fax: +91-0522-4095730 Abstract This paper examined theRead MoreTools and Techniques in Pr6845 Words   |  28 PagesRELATIONS 2. PUBLICITY MEDIA 3. TYPES OF PUBLICITY 4. OTHER FORMS OF PUBLICITY 5. TECHNIQUES USED TO SOLVE PR PROBLEMS 6. PR PROCESS 7. ISSUE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (New Jersey Physicians case) 8. CRISIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ( Mattel, Pepsi, Bhopal Gas Tragedy and Exxon case) 9. MODELS IN PR : Open System, Cybernetics and Roles of PR. Tools in Public Relations Publicity is the deliberate attempt to manage the publics perception of a subject. The subjects of publicity include

Lord of the Flies Intelligence and Good vs. Evil Free Essays

Good versus evil is a common concept used often in storytelling, writing, plays, movies, etc. the basic story line is commonly used and developed to mold different ideals, meanings, and lessons into different types of works. William Golding’s novel the Lord of the Flies falls into this category of works with the good versus evil story line. We will write a custom essay sample on Lord of the Flies: Intelligence and Good vs. Evil or any similar topic only for you Order Now Boiling the novel down to its most basic state it is a story of a group of boys. They all start out in a state of innocence, then as they adjust to their new surroundings after being stranded on a deserted island with no adults; they chose whether or not they turn from their innocence. When the boys turn from their innocence they go from being good to evil, or as the interpretation of this novel is commonly perceived the boys go from being civilized boys to savages. It is in this sense that civilized and good can be used interchangeably for this interpretation, and the same for evil and savagery. Golding puts an interesting twist to this basic plot right in the beginning of the story. Golding takes the story from just a simple tale of good versus evil to good versus evil with competing ideas of intelligence. Right in the beginning of the novel we see these ideas of intelligence take form. As the story builds the differences in the types of intelligence grows and becomes more distinct. From there the competition of good versus evil begins. After their plane crashes the boys who were on the plane to escape the warfare in England are scattered on the island. Ralph, the first boy we are introduced to meets another boy named Piggy. â€Å"It’s a shell! I seen one like that before. On someone’s back wall. A conch he called it. He used to blow it and then his mum would come. It’s ever so valuable-â€Å"(15). With Piggy’s help Ralph uses the conch they found to call out to the other boys on the island. This is the first hint at the two types of intelligence. Piggy is already exhibiting signs of natural intelligence. This type of intelligence is developed based on the sensory analysis of the surroundings. This intelligence is more advanced and enables Piggy to think in more civilized, advanced ways. He is immediately made fun of for his appearance and as the story progresses is mocked as a know-it-all. No one listens to Piggy, even though the conch and the meeting were his ideas no one realizes this, nor do they care. Once all the boys are gathered together there is a vote on who should be chief. A boy named Jack is introduced as the leader of the choir boys and he wants to be chief, but when put to a vote Ralph is elected. Ralph does give the choir to Jack and asks what they would like to be. Jack tells Ralph that he and his choir shall be the hunters. Ralph depicts more social intelligence. Ralph knows how to work a crowd, how to lead a group, and how to gain respect. â€Å"Everybody must stay round here and wait and not go away. Three of us- if we take more we’d get all mixed, and lose each other- three of us will go on an expedition and find out† (23-24). This act showed that Ralph was able to get the attention of the boys at any time and that the boys would actually listen to him. His ability to be able to accomplish this as quickly as he did really shows his true social intelligence. â€Å"If a ship comes near the island they may not notice us. So we must make smoke on top of the mountain. We must make a fire† (38). Ralph does show some natural intelligence as well, but not nearly as much as Piggy exhibits. Jack also shows a form of social intelligence. He is able to keep command over his choir and they listen to him no matter what. This shows that in the beginning of the story even though the boys are all different, have different types of intelligence, and have mixed feelings about the situation they are still united together as a whole. â€Å"All day I’ve been working with Simon. No one else. They’re off bathing, or eating, or playing† (50). The boys begin to slack and begin to realize that there aren’t consequences or punishments for the wrongs they do. Jack and his group of hunters become obsessed with the idea of killing a pig, and are the only ones exempt from helping build shelters, though the other boys don’t really care enough about their orders to help build or gather food. It’s at this point in the novel where there are serious signs of cracks and issues with the order system the boys have put in place since being on the island. Jack is beginning to slip into a more savage state, and is using his social intelligence to bring other boys down with him. The improvised form of society that the boys have created is already starting to weaken and fall. Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Spill her blood† (69). â€Å"Look! We’ve killed a pig-we stole up on them-we got into a circle-â€Å"(69). It is at this point in the novel where the group of hunters, the boys who killed the pig, have turned from innocence. The kill they had obsessed over finally happened and they were proud of themselves for killing. The a ct of killing a living creature, something they never had done before, was the true turning point for them. There was no turning back from it; the hunters even painted their faces, this sense of wearing a mask, pretending to be someone else enabled them to kill. ‘But they’ll be painted! You know how it is. ’ Eric says. The others nodded. They understood only too well the liberation into savagery that the concealing paint brought. ‘Well, we won’t be painted,’ said Ralph, ‘because we aren’t savages’† (Golding 172). Ralph is starting to understand that Jack and the group of boys who follow him are starting to turn to a more evil state. Ralph still tries to use his social intelligence and command over his boys so they don’t go over to Jack’s side. Within Jack’s group the obsession with hunting caused the boys to let the fire go out, and subsequently lose a chance at rescue. The hunters didn’t really seem to care about the fire; they were still overly hyped up about their kill, swearing that they would hunt again and bring back even more meat. As the boys become more and more content with letting go with the rules they get closer and closer to losing their sense of civilization completely. â€Å"‘If I blow the conch and they don’t come back; then we’ve had it. We shan’t keep the fire going. We’ll be like animals. We’ll never be rescued. ’â€Å" (Golding 92). As the boys start to fulfill their own wishes of hunting and playing they get sick of listening to Ralph and being controlled by the conch. They don’t want to do work; they just want to have fun. Jack rebels against Ralph and makes his own â€Å"tribe,† where he could be the leader and he would no longer be controlled by the conch. Evil starts to arise rapidly; the majority of the older boys side with Jack and abandon Ralph’s authority. After that Piggy, Sam and Eric are the older boys who remain with Ralph. As the night wears on, some of the â€Å"littleuns† sneak off to join Jack. This is truly the end of their makeshift society, it has completely failed. After the split of the group it appeared as though things could settle down, but Ralph and his boys find that it is nearly impossible to keep the rescue fire going. They need to ask the others for help but Jack’s boys are too afraid to help them. Jack had taken to using torturous and intimidation methods to keep control over his group. He wears a mask, like he did when he killed the first pig; this seems to allow Jack to give in completely to his â€Å"evil† savage side. It was while celebrating their savageness and reenacting the kill that they got carried away and got themselves overly worked up. The beast struggled forward, broke the ring and fell over the steep edge of the rock to the sand by the water. At once the crowd surged after it poured down the rock, leapt on to the beast, screamed struck, bit, tore. There were no words, and no movements but the tearing of teeth and claws† (Golding 153). The wickedness in all of the boys deludes them into mistaking Sim on, the only truly â€Å"good† pure boy, as the beastie. Simon was considered to be the â€Å"pure† boy, the epitome of civilization and innocence. Jack and the other boys had completely given themselves over to their evil sides, giving in to their natural instincts and savagery. Social Intelligence and natural intelligence are both qualities that help a person to be successful in life. However, overall, society puts greater worth in social intelligence. The abilities to work with others, lead and motivate others, and inspire others make a person successful in life. Just like good and evil, social and natural intelligence go hand in hand. One is not greater than the other, but like people believe good is better, people put more stock in social intelligence. In Lord of the Flies the boys put their trust in Ralph, but as time goes on, and rules begin to be broken, the less control Ralph seems to have. Social intelligence will only go so far, it can’t be natural instincts. Natural instincts are hidden behind the rules and expectations of society. When they begin to dwindle and those instincts become more prominent, that natural intelligence becomes important, it can be the intelligence or lack thereof that can make or break a situation. Without one, evil or good, natural intelligence or social intelligence, the other is not really known. Without evil how would we know what good is? If everyone was socially intelligent how would we know what natural intelligence is? The answer is we wouldn’t have a way of knowing. A person cannot know one without knowing of the other. Intelligence and good and evil all work together, as seen in Golding’s novel. Jack possessed the same kind of social intelligence as Ralph, but when he gave in to evil his social intelligence the power it gave him over the other boys allowed Jack to change the atmosphere of the island and turn the boys away from goodness and civilization. Piggy had natural intelligence but because he lacked any real social intelligence he was shunned, mocked, and in the end killed for this. He came off as a know-it-all and a whiner; this annoyed the other boys and eventually led to his demise. The boys didn’t put any stock in natural intelligence; they put all their stock in social intelligence and natural instinct. Ralph, with Piggy’s help, was able to remain civilized and good. Though he lost his hold on the boys he still had his social intelligence, and even some natural intelligence of his own to rely on. When Ralph was in charge his positive outlook affected the boys as well, they were positive because he was positive. The struggle between good and evil does not just affect the person who’s battling it within themselves, it also affects those around them, and subsequently can change them too. ? How to cite Lord of the Flies: Intelligence and Good vs. Evil, Papers

Negative Campaign Advertising free essay sample

A look at the use of negative campaign advertising and political and social debates around the concept. This paper explores the concept of negative campaign advertising. The author examines how politicians make use of negative advertising, the effects of such advertising, the legal concerns of negative advertising and the moral and ethical debates around the issue. Since the early 1980s, negative political advertising has become the dominant strategy of most campaigns for high-visibility offices in the United States and other countries. Negative political advertising is political advertising that implicitly or explicitly places the opposition in an inferior position, providing an argument that calls his/her fitness for office or leadership ability into question. (Johnson-Cartee and Copeland, p.20). Political consultants are less than eager to admit they actively participate in negative political advertising, creatively renaming negative ads in value-positive euphemisms and skirting the issue. This causes the extended inference that any type of negative advertising, even that which attempts to honestly educate the voter regarding legitimate shortcomings of a political opponent is inherently bad. We will write a custom essay sample on Negative Campaign Advertising or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page